The studies on photocatalysts such as TiO2, ZnO, ZnWO4 have suggested that the crystallinity, surface area, phase purity, electron – hole recombination rate etc. play key roles in their catalytic activity. In the present work, the effect of calcination temperature on the photocatalytic activity of ZnWO4 nanoparticles synthesized by calcining ZnO and WO3 nanoparticle mixture is explored. The structural characterization of the samples were carried out using X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Raman techniques. Photocatalytic activity of the samples were studied on the photodegradation of Methylene Blue. The pseudo-first-order rate constant, kapp(min-1),was calculated from the slope of ln (Co/Ct) versus irradiation time t. From the study of photodegradation of MB in the presence of ZnWO4 nanoparticles, it was observed that the samples calcined at 8000C displayed more photocatalytic activity compared to other samples.
Introduction
Background and Significance
Environmental pollution, driven by the industrial revolution and population explosion, has worsened globally.
Organic dyes from textile wastewater are particularly hazardous due to their toxicity, carcinogenic nature, and low biodegradability.
Conventional filtration is ineffective, prompting the need for green, cost-effective wastewater treatment methods.
Nanomaterials, especially semiconductor-based photocatalysts, offer promise in degrading organic pollutants under light exposure due to their:
High surface area
Reactive surface chemistry
Short diffusion distances
2. ZnWO? as a Promising Photocatalyst
Zinc tungstate (ZnWO?) is a potential photocatalyst due to:
High light yield and photosensitivity
Chemical stability and non-toxicity
Short decay time and moderate refractive index
ZnWO?'s photocatalytic activity under light makes it suitable for removal of dye pollutants from water.
3. Synthesis Methods
Multiple methods exist to synthesize ZnWO?, including:
Mechano-chemical synthesis, sol-gel, hydrothermal, solid-state, etc.
In this study:
ZnO and WO? nanoparticles were synthesized via wet chemical precipitation.
These were mixed in a 1:3 molar ratio, milled, and calcined at 400°C, 600°C, 800°C, and 1000°C.
The goal was to optimize phase purity and photocatalytic efficiency through calcination temperature control.
4. Experimental Procedures
ZnO was prepared from zinc acetate and NaOH with EDTA as a capping agent.
WO? was synthesized from sodium tungstate and nitric acid.
The photocatalytic ability of ZnWO? was tested by degrading methylene blue dye using UV-Vis spectroscopy.
80W mercury vapor lamp was used for illumination during the photocatalytic experiment.
5. Key Results
XRD Analysis:
ZnO was in hexagonal (wurtzite) phase; WO? was orthorhombic.
ZnWO? samples calcined at 800°C and 1000°C showed pure monoclinic phase—ideal for photocatalysis.
Crystallite size increased with higher calcination temperatures, suggesting improved crystallinity.
HRTEM Analysis:
Nanoparticles calcined at 800°C were ~50 nm in size.
Interplanar spacing of 0.27 nm matched the (111) plane of ZnWO?.
SAED patterns confirmed phase purity.
Conclusion
Photocatalytic reaction is a green technique for waste water treatment, performed in the presence of light and suitable catalyst which degrade the pollutant in water. In the present work, nanostructured ZnWO4 were synthesized by calcining ZnO and WO3 nanoparticles at 4000 C, 6000 C, 8000 C and 10000 C. From the XRD pattern of ZnWO4, it was observed that the samples calcined at 8000 C and 10000C exhibited pure monoclinic phase of zinc tungstate while that at 4000 C and 6000 C exhibited reflection peaks corresponding to WO3 also. The grain sizes of nanoparticles of ZnWO4 were calculated using Debye-Scherrer equation. It was observed that the grain size of zinc tungstate nanoparticles increases with increase in calcining temperature. Results of Raman spectra analysis suggested that the ZnWO4 nanocrystals calcined at 8000 C and 10000C were structurally ordered in the short range and correspond to a wolframite-type monoclinic structure. The samples calcined at 4000 C and 6000 C exhibited Raman peaks corresponding to WO3 phase. Photocatalytic activities of the samples were studied on the photodegradation of Methylene Blue. The photocatalytic efficiency and pseudo-first-order rate constant, kapp(min-1) were calculated. It was observed that the samples calcined at 8000 C show more photocatalytic activity and the samples calcined at 10000 C exhibited poor catalysis. The ZnWO4 samples calcined at 8000 C has phase purity compared to that calcined at 6000 C and less grain size compared to that calcined at 10000 C. This may be the reason for the substantially high photocatalytic activity of ZnWO4 samples calcined at 8000 C compared to others.
References
[1] Saratale R G, Rajesh Banu J, Shin H S, Bharagava R N and Saratale G D 2020 Textile Industry Wastewaters as Major Sources of Environmental Contamination: Bioremediation Approaches for Its Degradation and Detoxification. In: Saxena G, Bharagava R, Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety, Springer Singapore 1 p.135
[2] Sadaf Bashir Khan and Shern Long Lee 2021 Nano Ex. 2 022002
[3] Xiaolei Qu, Pedro J.J. Alvarez, Qilin Li 2013 Water Res. 47 12 p.3931
[4] Homaeigohar S 2020 Nanomaterials 10 2 p.295
[5] Ohtani B, Ogawa Y and Nishimoto S 1997 J. Phys. Chem. B 101 19 p.3746
[6] Sonik Bhatia and Neha Verma 2017 Mater. Res. Bull. 95 p.468
[7] Huang G, Zhang C and Zhu Y 2007 J. Alloys Compd. 432 p.269
[8] Chunyang Li, Xiaodi Du, Yurong Shi and Zhenling Wang 2019 Micro Nano Lett. 14 5 p.496
[9] Hongbo Fu, Jie Lin, Liwu Zhang and Yongfa Zhu 2006 Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 306 p.58
[10] Pereira P F S, Gouveia A F, Assis M, De Oliveira R C, Pinatti I M, Penha M et al 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 p.1923
[11] Mancheva M, Iordanova R, and Dimitriev Y 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 p.15
[12] Dodd A, Mckinley A, Tsuzuki T and Saunders M 2009 J. Eur. Ceram. 29 1 p.139
[13] Oi T, Takagi K and Fukazawa T 1980 Appl. Phys. Lett. 36 p.278
[14] Buhl J C and Willgallis A 1986 Chem. Geol. 56 p.271
[15] Phani A R, Passacantando M, Lozzi L and Santucci S 2000 J. Mater. Sci. 35 19 p.4879
[16] Lou Z, Hao J and Cocivera M 2002 J. Lumin. 99 4 p.349
[17] Ryu Jeong Ho, Lim Chang and Auh Keun 2003 Mater. Lett. 57 9 p.1550
[18] Ran Songlin and Gao Lian 2006 Chem. Lett. 35 11 p.1312
[19] Huang G and Zhu Y 2007 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 139 p.201
[20] Wu Yan, Zhang Shi-cheng, Zhang Li-wu, Zhu Yong-fa 2007 Chem. Res. Chinese U. 23 4 p.465
[21] Keereeta Y, Thongtem T and Thongtem S 2011 J. Alloys Compd. 509 23 p.6689
[22] Faka V, Tsoumachidou S, Moschogiannaki M, Kiriakidis G, Poulios I and Binas V 2021 J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 406 p.113002
[23] Buekenhoudt A Kovalevsky, Luyten J and Snijkers F 2010 1.11 Basic Aspects in Inorganic Membrane Preparation Enrico Drioli and Lidietta Giorno Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering Elsevier 217
[24] Cullity B D and Stock S R 2001 Elements of X-ray Diffraction Third Edition. New York : Prentice-Hall
[25] Liu Y, Wang H, Chen G, Zhou Y D, Gu B Y and Hu B Q 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 p.4651
[26] Liu Meng-ting, Xiao En-cai, Lv Ji-qing, Qi Ze-ming, Yue Zhenxing, Chen Ying Chen et al 2020 J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron 31 8 p.6192
[27] Kalinko A, Kuzmin A 2009 J. Lumin. 129 10 p.1144
[28] Errandonea D, Manjón F J, Garro N, Rodríguez-Hernández P, Radescu S, Mujica A, Muñoz A and Tu C Y 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 054116
[29] Yajun Wang, Zhenxing Wang, Safdar Muhammad and Jun He 2012 CrystEngComm. 14 p.5065
[30] Pandurangan A, Kamala P, Uma S, Palanichamy M and Murugesan V 2001 Ind. J. Chem. Technol. 8 p.496
[31] Hinda Lachheb, Eric Puzenat, Ammar Houas, Mohamed Ksibi, Elimame Elaloui, Chantal Guillard et al 2002 Appl. Catal. B 39 1 p.75
[32] Molinari R, Argurio P, Bellardita M and Palmisano L 2017 3.5 Photocatalytic Processes in Membrane Reactors Enrico Drioli, Lidietta Giorno, Enrica Fontananova Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering Sec. Ed. Elsevier p.101
[33] Tang J, Zou Z and Ye J 2004 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 p.4463